| Home | Land | Air | Sea | Missiles | Weapons | Surveillance | Comms | Europe | Russia | S. America | S.E Asia |
ASTOR - Britain's Choice |
||||||
|
GDR assesses the contenders for Britain's airborne stand-off radar requirement. |
Last summer's UK strategic defence review (SDR) identified surveillance and target acquisition as a key capability for 21st-century military forces. Today's conflicts and crises make the timely and accurate detection of threats and targets vital, the SDR therefore re-affirmed the UK's interest in acquiring such a capability through the ASTOR programme.
ASTOR will be the Labour government's first high-profile military-procurement decision. It is understood that the British government plans to choose the winner of the £750m ($1.2 million) project in late spring with a fixed-price contract issued by the middle of 1999 and the system to be in service around 2003. The British requirement calls for a radar surveillance system that can observe deep behind enemy lines or across hostile borders often as far as hundreds of miles, using a variety of radar modes. These will include synthetic aperture radar (SAR) that produces photograph-like images, and moving-target-indicator (MTI) radar that can track vehicle movements over large areas. These systems will have to be able to monitor large areas and hence the air platform needs to be able to fly at altitudes of around 50,000ft. The SAR radar is in turn required to operate in two modes: spot mode, to highlight a specific target, and swath mode, to build up a large picture by patching together a number of radar images. Any data or imagery captured by ASTOR's sensors needs to be moved around the digital battlefield by means of so-called tactical internets to a number of headquarters and intelligence analysis centres via a number of data links. Unlike the American Northrop Grumman E-8C Joint STARS, ASTOR is intended to be a total system, involving not just the air platform to carry the sensors but a number of ground-control stations or nodes to receive product and route it into British and allied digital-battlefield communication systems. It will carry a three-man mission crew in addition to two flight-deck personnel who will be able to carry out limited exploitation of data while airborne, so a major part of the project is also an integrated package of crew training and logistic support. The British government's so-called smart- procurement initiative is heavily influencing the ASTOR programme. The winner will have had to demonstrate that its product is low risk, can be delivered within the £750 million budget, can allow for incremental growth and contains high commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) elements with minimum development work. The contenders |
||||
|
The MoD's very narrow requirements have driven the contenders towards some very similar technical answers. For example, they all offer solutions that use four to five executive jet-class aircraft as the air platform for the sensors that have their antenna mounted in a canoe under the forward fuselage.
Although system integration, air-platform performance, logistic support, training, air- platform modification, ground-shelter design, data-link capabilities and many other elements are crucial to the success of ASTOR, attention has focused on the sensor package as the main element differentiating the rival bids. Two contenders are UK-based subsidiaries of US giants. Lockheed Martin UK Government Systems (LM UKGS) and Raytheon Systems Limited (RSL) have offered solutions based on what are said to be relatively mature designs. However, Northrop Grumman is offering what it claims is radically new technology based on US government work to upgrade the Joint STARS. The degree to which the relative designs can be considered British, and open for export in lucrative foreign markets without a US congressional veto, is also crucial to the ASTOR contract. Raytheon |
|||||
|
Raytheon's airborne mission-sensor system is based on an upgraded version of the ASARS-2 radar used in the Lockheed U-2R Dragon Lady surveillance aircraft since the 1980s. It claims the dual-mode radar uses low-risk architecture based on RSL's ASARS-2 improvement programme, HISAR and Global Hawk radars. "ASARS [on the U-2] is the most highly utilised radar in the world," said Peter Robbie, RSL's director of reconnaissance and surveillance systems. "If it's in the news, we've been there."
The design authority for the radar and its antenna (being built by Marconi Electronic Systems) will rest in the UK. This will allow the system to be exported as a UK product, claims the company. "Winning ASTOR will allow RSL to grow a major electronic missions system- integration capability in the UK," said a company spokesman. "The programme will enable the transfer of technologies and system- integration expertise from the US to the UK. Design authority and logistic support for Raytheon's ASTOR system will rest in the UK." Robbie said that Raytheon is offering the MoD sufficient ownership of software to allow the system to be exported. Team Astor |
|||||
|
Lockheed Martin's bid is unique because it includes Racal Radar Defence Systems, one of Britain's two radar manufacturers, as its design lead on the ASTOR radar. Their radar is the result of more than 20 years' work by Racal and MoD research establishments to develop battlefield surveillance radars. Racal says that the radar is now fully developed and ready for production. "Our radar is not a compromise or hybrid, it's not someone else's radar mock-up," said John Palmer, Racal's senior surveillance consultant. "It does not need an [upgrade] before it goes into production."
According to LM UKGS's director of advanced programmes, C4I/surveillance, Greg Davis, its ASTOR sensor is a UK radar that has been purpose-designed to meet the UK requirement. "The radar needs to give equal importance to SAR and MTI so there was a requirement to build a new radar because no existing radar met the requirement," he said. "It is an active scanning radar that provides adaptable beam shapes Ð broad beams for MTI and narrow beams for SAR." Thanks to the Racal link, Team ASTOR is playing the home-team card. "[Our radar] is fully compliant with the UK's requirement, it is a high-technology solution, provides real jobs for the UK, retains and grows the UK technology base and has real growth potential," said Alan Gordon, Racal's marketing manager. Wizard |
|||||
|
The final contestant in the ASTOR contest is US defence electronics giant Northrop Grumman and its UK partners led by British Aerospace and Computing Devices, teamed under the Wizard banner. Northrop Grumman has drawn on its experience as the maker of the Joint STARS system to offer Britain a system built around the technology being developed for the USAF. According to Northrop Grumman the so-called radar technology insertion programme (RTIP) offers tomorrow's performance today.
The active, two-dimensional, electronically scanned array radar is a scaled-down version of the RTIP sensor, according to Frank Dogaer, Northrop Grumman's Wizard programme manager. The RTIP technology means the sensor performance will be significantly better in many modes than Britain requires, claims Northrop Grumman. Because of the USAF's involvement in RTIP technology, any purchase and technology- transfer agreement is likely to be governed by a government-to-government agreement. Northrop Grumman also says it has made approaches to Racal and Marconi, Britain's two radar houses, to team up to incorporate RTIP into ASTOR. "We want a high-technology partner agreement," said Dogaer. "RTIP is a low-risk solution. It could be risky if we didn't have the right credentials, but we believe we have them." Marty Dandridge, Northrop Grumman's vice-president and general manager for surveillance and battlefield management systems, said: "Wizard offers significant potential for export, offering BAe, Computing Devices and the radar house we team with, an organic ASTOR capability in the UK." Endgame |
|||||
|
The three teams staked out their turf at last September's Farnborough airshow amid much rancour between Raytheon and Northrop Grumman over the fate of the $750 million RTIP programme. According to Brigadier-General David Nagy, USAF's director of information dominance, RTIP is vital to an air force's information superiority core competency and will ensure information supremacy in 2010. It involves replacing the existing APY-3 multi-mode, phased-array radar with an electronically scanned array radar. According to Nagy, after advanced signal processing, the RTIP offers five- to tenfold increases in air-to-ground performance. The Pentagon has offered the UK government a proposal to develop the RTIP sensor co-operatively for migration into the E-8C as well as UK platforms.
At the end of November 1998 Northrop Grumman and Raytheon finally agreed to a 50-50 work-share on the radar sensor portion of RTIP, with Raytheon working as a subcontractor. Prior to this agreement Northrop Grumman had claimed that its ASTOR bid offered the only route for the UK joint RTIP, so there may now be a route for RTIP technology to be used by other ASTOR contenders. The UK MoD continues to give ASTOR a high priority and there is no indication that it might be delayed. If it gets the go-ahead, ASTOR will provide the UK with a highly capable surveillance system and possibly a head start in the global market. |
| Top | Home | Land | Air | Sea | Missiles | Weapons | Surveillance | Comms | Europe | Russia | S.America | Asia |
Copyright © 1999 Global Defence Review Ltd. All rights reserved. Question or Comments? email info@global-defence.com |