| Armoured fighting vehicles Co-operation proves to be the way forward |
![]() |
| Bob Morrison previews the British, French and German armed forces' next generation of armoured fighting vehicles. |
The major armed forces in Europe have
established an essentially similar requirement for new armoured transport and utility
vehicles that will be required to enter service early in the next century. To this end the
British, French and German governments are working in close co-operation at specification
level and to meet their needs two international consortia have been formed. |
Both contenders have produced
wooden mock-ups based on a 6x6 configuration, rear-exit vehicle with a roof-mounted,
remotely operated machine gun.
|
||
The French vehicule blinde de combat d'Infanterie (VBCI) programme has similar requirements to VTK/MRAV but for some roles a 25mm canon turret is specified rather than a machine gun. During 1997 the French government ran a parallel evaluation programme based on nationally produced alternative vehicles but subsequently confirmed its intention to rejoin the GTK/MRAV programme as a full partner. GIAT Industries, Renault and Panhard submitted proposals that they felt better suited the French specification requirements than GTK/MRAV but the French office of defence procurement decided to pursue the programme with Britain and Germany with the proviso that France should have a role in development and production in proportion to its offtake. |
![]() The ARGE GTK mock-up. ![]() The French VAB armoured personnel carrier is likely to be replaced by the MRAV. ![]() A French VBL armoured personnel carrier; during 1997 the French government ran an evaluation programme based on nationally produced vehicles. |
Both GTK configured mock-ups, as shown at the 1997 Royal Navy &
British Army Equipment Exhibition (RNBAEE97), are similar in design, both engines being
mounted at the front of the hull. The engine of the ARGE version is transversely mounted
to provide additional frontal protection. This design layout requires the driver's station
to be located farther back but allows a single-piece sloping glacis plate to be used and
offers maximum driver protection in combat conditions. The TEAM GTK is more conventional
in its design, the driver's station is offset to the right with armoured glazing on three
sides of a raised armoured cab. For closed-down operations, the glazing is protected by
raisable armoured shutters, the driver using overhead vision blocks. TEAM International have announced that their vehicle will have an armoured hull incorporating MEXAS applique armour. ARGE GTK have indicated only that their proposal has a double-skinned hull for reduced thermal signature and that its side armour is modular for rapid upgrade in theatre. Combat weight of both contenders is expected to be in the 25-to-30-tonne range. Both proposed vehicles will make maximum use of commercially available and proven truck components to keep costs to a minimum and to maximise spares availability. Precise details are not being released at present for commercial reasons but it is known that gearboxes will be automatic and drive-lines will be of standard I configuration with differential locks. Central tyre-inflation systems also will be fitted as a standard feature for enhanced off-road performance over soft or sandy ground. Both vehicles are capable of transporting eight infantrymen with all packs and equipment. The TEAM proposal willseat nine in addition to the vehicle commander and driver. Individual inward facing seats with safety harnesses are provided in both but theTEAM GTK/ MRAVIVBCI also offers the option of swivel seating to allow the squad to face forwards for maximum comfort during transit journeys. |
| Neither vehicle allows infantrymen to fire their
weapons from inside and individual vision blocks are not provided. Small roof hatches,
primarily for emergency escape, are indicated. The only radical difference between the two
contender vehicles is that the ARGE GTK/ MRAV/VBCI has a replaceable mission module that
can be interchanged within one hour. It is intended that these armoured modules will be
free-standing to allow static installation of headquarters, medical or logistic
facilities. The modules that form a primary safety cell with a triple floor are also
airportable and heliportable and weigh approximately eight tonnes. The base vehicle is
capable of independent operation and with the rear module removed could be used as a
high-mobility, open-load carrier with fully armoured cab. It is now anticipated that the final decision on a manufacturer will be announced during the next two or three months, after the British government's strategic defence review. |